SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Graham and Doddsville -- Value Investing In The New Era -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: porcupine --''''> who wrote (859)10/3/1998 2:39:00 PM
From: porcupine --''''>  Respond to of 1722
 
Good news for cyclicals: Another soft landing in the works --

"Job Creation Lagged in September, U.S. Reports"

By SYLVIA NASAR

Job creation fell in September to the lowest rate
in more than two years, the Labor Department
reported Friday --
the most persuasive evidence yet that the financial
crisis abroad is slowing the booming U.S. economy.

The Labor Department said the unemployment rate edged
up only slightly, to 4.6 percent from 4.5 percent in
August. But payrolls expanded by just 69,000 jobs, a
fraction of the 309,000 jobs created in August or the
roughly 200,000 that had been expected by forecasters.

Total hours worked dipped, suggesting that production
and income were leveling out, and hourly pay barely
inched up.

The Labor Department's monthly employment report is
considered the most substantial assessment of the
economy's health. Coming on top of other signs of
weakness -- falling exports, slowing retail sales and
weaker business investment -- the data reinforced a
view among economists that the eight-year-old expansion
was being crimped by the economic problems that began
afflicting Asia last year and have since spread.

"It's a warning sign of slower economic growth ahead,"
said Steven Roach, chief economist at Morgan Stanley
Dean Witter.

Investors treated the weak jobs report not as a
warning, but as a pleasant surprise -- a green light
for further easing of interest rates by the Federal
Reserve, which cut rates Tuesday for the first time in
nearly three years in an effort to forestall an
economic downturn.

Stock prices strengthened Friday after two days of
heavy losses, and the Dow Jones industrial average rose
152.16 points, or 1.99 percent. Long-term bond yields,
a barometer of interest rate trends, fell to 4.84
percent, another in a series of 31-year lows.

The Labor Department also reported that employment
growth had been stronger in July and weaker in August
than initially reported, underscoring that the slowdown
in job growth since midsummer has been steep.

Excluding the gyrations caused by the General Motors
strikes, gains in employment shrank from 270,000 jobs
in July to 160,000 in August to the very modest
September gain.

"The revisions don't change our sense of where we are,"
said Katherine Abraham, the commissioner of the Bureau
of Labor Statistics. "But they make the decline in job
growth more marked."

A fraying at the edges of what was until recently a
vibrant labor market has already been reflected in a
retreat in consumer confidence in the last few weeks
from record highs. The University of Michigan, which
tallies a widely followed index of consumer confidence,
reported Friday that the index slipped to 100.9 in
September from 104.4 in August.

To be sure, the U.S. labor market still remains healthy
by any historical measure. The change in the overall
unemployment rate, for example, reflected a change of a
few hundredths of a percentage point that was then
magnified by rounding. Unemployment among most
demographic groups -- at the lowest levels in 25 or 30
years -- has not budged. And the percentage of
Americans working actually rebounded to a near record
of 64.1 percent.

"These are still signs of a very strong labor market,"
said Alan Krueger, a labor economist at Princeton
University. "Most people who want jobs are still able
to find them."

But the snapshot of the labor market confirmed that the
risks facing the economy have shifted toward much
slower growth, maybe even recession.

Signs of cooling in the labor market were widespread.
Factory payrolls continued to shrink in September,
dropping by 16,000 jobs and bringing the total number
of manufacturing jobs lost this year to 114,000. With
exports to Asia and Latin America plunging, imports
soaring and production flat or contracting, the makers
of electrical equipment, machinery and other industrial
products have been forced to lay off workers.

The weakness in manufacturing is likely to persist.
Orders for long-lasting goods were up over all by 0.9
percent in August, but excluding aircraft and
automobiles (which were bolstered by the end of the GM
strikes) orders declined 1.2 percent. Construction
contracted by 20,000 jobs, not just in residential
building but also in heavy construction like roads and
bridges. That is the first decline this year other than
those that reflected the vagaries of the weather and
seasonal adjustments. It is also a sharp contrast to
the average monthly gains of around 24,000.

Most striking, however, was a sharp slowdown in hiring
in the sprawling service sector, which employs more
than 80 percent of American workers. Services added
just 105,000 jobs in September, compared with the
average of 215,000 a month since the start of the year.
Particularly noteworthy was that the head count at
temporary-help suppliers, a leading indicator of future
permanent hiring, dropped sharply, by 44,000. Temporary
hiring has been zigging up and down all summer, but the
September slump was bigger.

Wage inflation seems to be cooling with the labor
market. The trend in hourly pay, which seemed to be
picking up in the first half of the year, now seems to
be leveling out or even slowing. Hourly pay was up just
4 percent from a year earlier, compared with a rise of
4.3 percent from May 1997 to May 1998.

Despite the overall pattern of cooling off, hiring did
pick up in a number of industries, including wholesale
and retail trade, computer services, management
consulting and financial services. The brightest spot:
the amusement industry, which includes theme parks,
bowling alleys, movie theaters and video parlors, all
places where Americans can leave their worries at the
door.

Copyright 1998 The New York Times Company



To: porcupine --''''> who wrote (859)10/3/1998 3:01:00 PM
From: porcupine --''''>  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1722
 
It's amazing that 4 people at the top of UBS had to resign for betting on LTMC (see: dailynews.yahoo.com )-- yet, John Meriwether gets to stay on. And, it's interesting that the rescuers find him indispensibe (see article below). Buffett's offer required that the current principals be removed, but the Fed arranged a rescue on more favorable terms. Buffett had indicated no need on his part to have LTCM "rocket scientists" tell him how to trade bonds.

Down and Out at the Hedge Fund?
Maybe, but Don't Bet on It
By JOSEPH KAHN and PETER TRUELL -- October 3, 1998

Can John W. Meriwether, the founder of Long-Term
Capital Management and the man behind the hedge
fund's crumbling tower of multibillion-dollar bets on
world financial markets, make another comeback?

In 1991, Mr. Meriwether, then a top executive and a
star bond trader at Salomon Brothers, was ousted after
a subordinate sought to corner the market on sales of
United States Government bonds. Three years later, he
raised $1.5 billion from Wall Street colleagues and
founded Long-Term Capital, which became one of the
world's most aggressive and profitable hedge funds.

The near-collapse of Long-Term Capital last month
nearly wiped out the stakes of Mr. Meriwether, his 16
partners and outside investors, and made him synonymous
with speculative excess.

"His obituary has already been written," a long-time
friend said. "The man who nearly broke the world."

But such judgments may be premature, others say. The
consortium of 14 financial firms that pumped $3.6
billion into Long-Term Capital, rescuing it from
certain bankruptcy, agreed to keep Mr. Meriwether, his
partners and his management team intact as a condition
of the deal. He and his partners still control 3.3
percent of the equity in the fund. And Wall Street
executives involved in the bailout say that Mr.
Meriwether and his 180-member team will be paid 1
percent of assets as a management fee and a 12.5
percent share of annual profits over a hurdle level.

If the banks and brokerage houses that rescued
Long-Term Capital are right, and its bets on world bond
and equity markets eventually pay off, Mr. Meriwether
and company can quickly pocket tens of millions of
dollars under that incentive plan.

"Of course people are angry at him; they blame him for
this," said a brokerage firm executive involved in the
bailout. "But as far as I know, no one suggested that
he should go -- that you should break up the
partnership. Put it this way: If he does well, we all
do well."

The potential for Mr. Meriwether to make a comeback has
already begun to raise questions among critics of the
Long-Term Capital bailout, which was brokered by the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Some critics have
questioned whether the effort to save the fund was
necessary, and whether it might send the wrong message
to other big speculative funds.

At Congressional hearings to discuss the Long-Term
Capital rescue Thursday, there were also questions
raised as to why the deal backed by the Federal Reserve
was more favorable to Mr. Meriwether than an
alternative proposal put forward by private investors,
including Goldman, Sachs & Company.

"Perhaps the only smart deal of the month that
Long-Term Capital did was they played the Fed off
against another party," said Representative Jim Leach,
the Iowa Republican who is chairman of the House
Banking Committee, referring to Mr. Meriwether's
rejection of the Goldman deal and his acceptance of the
terms offered by the bank consortium.

Long-Term Capital is not certain to return to
profitability, of course. The continued sharp rise of
the United States Government bond market is unfavorable
to Long-Term Capital's positions, traders say, and may
be causing deeper losses for the fund now. There is no
prospect of returning to profits until the worldwide
investor flight to quality eases, relieving the stress
on riskier securities that Long-Term Capital owns.

The Wall Street firms that now control the hedge fund
have installed six derivatives, bond and risk
management experts at Long-Term Capital responsible for
looking over Mr. Meriwether's shoulder each day -- and
making the ultimate calls of key investment and
management decisions. The firms could also decide to
liquidate Long-Term Capital positions and essentially
dismantle the fund, leaving Mr. Meriwether and his
colleagues with little.

Moreover, people who work for Long-Term Capital say
that 3 or 4 of the 16 partners borrowed heavily from
banks to finance their equity stakes in the fund, and
now face the prospect of personal bankruptcy.

Still, there are signs that the worst is over for
Long-Term Capital's principals. The fund's new
investors have de-emphasized their early goal of an
"orderly liquidation" of Long-Term Capital's positions.
Most now talk of a three-year time frame for managing
the fund. Many bank executives familiar with
Long-Term's gambles also see them as fundamentally
sound, if highly overleveraged, and talk about making
big profits when markets come back.

Most important, a consensus has emerged among the
consortium members that Mr. Meriwether should stay. For
one, he is the person most familiar with Long-Term
Capital's complex derivatives positions. And in his
absence, the 14 consortium members, already prone to
disputes, might find it difficult to agree on a
successor.

"It would be foolish for us to get rid of him and then
try to agree on someone else," said the Wall Street
executive involved in the bailout. "Our best bet was to
give him the incentives to do well."

Long-Term Capital partners who face possible bankruptcy
might also get some relief. There are now attempts to
negotiate agreements with their creditors, which
include Bear, Stearns and Crédit Lyonnais, that would
prevent them from having to file for personal
bankruptcy. One alternative explored in recent days
would give creditors a claim on the future earnings of
these hard-pressed managing partners.

Some people associated with the fund have also
speculated that some of the managing partners who are
in better financial circumstances may help others who
now face bankruptcy as a way of maintaining the
Long-Term Capital team.

Copyright 1998 The New York Times Company