Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Harmond who wrote (19840)	10/3/1998 3:36:00 PM
From: OtherChap	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

>Tell me Craig, collectively who has made more money from Amazon...the >longs or the shorts? Once again William your fatal weakness shows- you don't seem to understand that everything including the market has cycles. What goes up does not always go up forever. Shorts will have their time in the sun. Have you ever heard of a stock called netscape? You still refuse to comment at all about it.. It was even more overpriced than Amazon OR yahoo, at least for 6 months or so. But in its second year, when it became clear they weren't going to produce massive earnings (and in fact started showing continuing losses) the stock collapsed down to 20. How much money did you lose on that one, eh?

To: Bill Harmond who wrote (19840)	10/3/1998 3:51:00 PM
From: craig crawford	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 164684

>> Count on Craig to obfuscate with his calculations << Hmm...obfuscate, good word. Let's see what kind of rhyme I can come up with. Hmm...count on William to extrapolate future AMZN price trends from previous ones. >> Tell me Craig, collectively who has made more money from Amazon...the longs or the shorts? << Ahh, now you choose to interrogate! Tell me William, what has that got to do with how much shorts will confiscate from the longs going forward?