SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Who, me? who wrote (7005)10/3/1998 8:14:00 PM
From: dougjn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
The Iran-contra investigation lasted seven years and cost 60 billion dollars and the report was delivered on Friday before the election on Tuesday! The Democrats don't seem to remember any of this,

Well, I DO, and keep volunteering my disgust with the drag out of Iran-Contra before anyone else brings it up.

I also expressed that disgust to close friends at the time.

BTW, I've always thought that the cost of these things is a silly issue. It's a drop in the sea for the Federal budget. Or rather, the cost is relevant primarily to the question of proportionality, and the onslaught that any individual, even the President when forced to defend himself with his own privately paid attorneys (if he wishes to enjoy attorney-client privilege, which is fundament to a good defense).

Although that was at root about high foreign policy issues, and the current Starr referral is at root about sex sin in the White House, my reasons for disgust are actually similar. The basic underlying conduct was not clearly illegal. And although extremely distasteful to many or most in the opposing party (and to many people generally), it wasn't really enough to go forward. Instead, in each case, the investigation devolved primarily into a sort of gotcha perjury trap.

As many of these investigations have. The charges against Cisneros for lying to the FBI about the fact that he had a mistress for example. (Under Federal statutes, lying to the FBI is generally a crime - which I regard as completely outrageous, but there you are. (Who are they, a neutral and fair tribunal under all circumstances. Balanced by the challenge of opposing counsel? Etc., etc.)

Doug



To: Who, me? who wrote (7005)10/3/1998 9:39:00 PM
From: Les H  Respond to of 67261
 
Lewinsky confided in counselor about affair with Clinton
cnn.com

WASHINGTON
(AllPolitics, October
3) -- Just after
President Bill Clinton
won re-election in
1996, Monica
Lewinsky, exiled
from the White
House and trying to
get back, was seeing
a counselor because of depression and anxiety,
according to investigators for Independent Counsel
Ken Starr.

Licensed Certified Social Worker Kathleen Estep
told investigators she met with Lewinsky three times
in November 1996, after Lewinsky was referred to
her by a doctor at a Virginia weight loss clinic,
according to a document released Friday by the
House Judiciary Committee.

The first of their meetings occurred very near the time
of a now famous videotape of Lewinsky greeting
Clinton as he worked a rope line during a White
House lawn welcoming ceremony after he returned
from Little Rock. In the videotape, the president hugs
Lewinsky, who was smiling and wearing a beret.

Estep, in an interview
with Associate
Independent Counsel
Mike Emmick and an
FBI agent, said Lewinsky went into detail about her
relationship with Clinton.

But she told of one incident even Estep found hard to
believe.

Estep said Lewinsky told her Clinton once paid a 2
a.m. visit to her apartment, along with Secret Service
agents.

"Estep recalls thinking Lewinsky may have made this
up because the scenario of the President doing that
seemed so incredible," the FBI report said. "Other
than this one instance, Estep felt Lewinsky was
credible and well-grounded."

There has been no other testimony or documentation
found in any of the investigative data gathered by
Starr's office to indicate that Clinton ever went to
Lewinsky's apartment. There has been testimony of
post-midnight telephone calls.

The report said Estep said she found Lewinsky to be
"very anxious," which she attributed to "her failed
relationships, her fear of relationships not lasting,
especially her relationship with Clinton; and her
relationship with her father."

She said the three sessions were not enough to make
a sound diagnosis of Lewinsky, but that she "had a
lot of indicators which might lead to a diagnosis of
clinical depression," the report said.

Estep said she did not take complete notes of the
sessions because Lewinsky was worried about too
much being written down.