Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : IKAR Mining Tungsten iron ore gold silver copper cobalt -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alan Markoff who wrote (348)	10/4/1998 5:06:00 PM
From: Ga Bard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 631

No Alan your motives are because you have such a major investment along with a loss in equity. It is balantly obvious plus arrogantly demonstrates your lack of repect or consideration for the SEC which I will NEVER EVER do again. That release is extremely self-explaintory. I warned you I felt they were pulling your leg but you were convinced they were shooting straight with you the same as I did with Midland. The difference with Midland vs IKAR is there were about 14 other investors that had verified the information and had black and white proof to back it up. You can say what you want I really do not care because my whole life is in the hands of the SEC. I do not care whether you rub my back or not because I have a paper trail to prove what I say. You, as the rest of us, are nothing more than a private investor doing the best you can. However, you are the one that has decided who is what and have no regard what so ever for the truth or for anyone but yourself. Filmdude on CW I accused as you have me and you know what ... HE WAS EXACTLY CORRECT even though he was a naysayer same as TMB and a few others. This flaming naysayers is a crock for negative obviously truthful and sincerely pointing out the facts whether good or bad. Both good, bad, and ugly should be on these threads. You have a double standard in your logic. If I tell you what I am told and it does not come truth you hold me liable for telling you something, However you do not wish to be held liable for anything you say under the freedom of speech, opinion and the excuse we all use: "I was told that." Is that not a double standard for that type of logic? The news release is the exact truth. There is no mining planned as you have been informing me for months which I do not hold you responsible for. I hold IKAR management that told you that responsible and nothing can remotely be used to show that mining that property would even be profitable. You have no regard for the news release and the truth then fine. You want to bring up Midland and use it to attack me when you gave your approval which is in your posts based on your own conversations with Dan Fisher and John Spriggs. Now you hold me responsible for Midland when I in fact caught the guy and did something about it by stepping up to the plate which put me in front of the SEC. Now your posts on Midland you will have to live with and NOT be able to put off on me for bringing in all the people you did. Same as you are doing IKAR. Again that is not your fault for people should be responsible for their own investments. You are right! I liked this stock until the figures began changing and the volume increased as the stock began to fall. Your excuse was shorting and I told you all they were doing would not take out a short. NOTHING TAKES OUT A SHORT >>> NOTHING. Nothing less that a court order will make a short cover. Shares are being sold into the market and have been for months. The trading charts you yourself have taught me on you now disgard. You can do and say what ever you want and accuse me of what ever. It is not going to change the facts on any stock. This stock and Midland have exactly NOTHING and we both are victims to the truth plus the false information we were given by the companies and management. Sugar coat it however you want. Remember you are my mentor and taught me which I did as I was taught. What did I get from your teachings? Myself in front of the SEC because I stepped up to the plate when someone needed to which you did not teach me but that is my character. Be careful how you promote a stock on line and if you are naive enough to think for one minute IKAR made that release out of the goodness of their hearts to clear up the water, then fine. I did not believe that Dan Fisher gave that split out of the goodness of his heart either. Others did though. We have discussed the SEC for months on this stock since you found out they inquired about you being a paid promotor. Color this anyway you want but the truth always seems to surface before it is over. I As far as your misrepresentations about me and my character over the past 90 days ... go read the truth. I have the paper trail to back it up along with witnesses. bardology.com You do not like my kids accounts but I am a father first and if I believe in a stock I will put shares in my family accounts. But you have a problem with a father trying to build a future for their kids then fine. You have a problem with someone buying stock options and private placements which have been a part of the market since it started then fine. Write your congreesman and get it changed. I mirror you in my diligence and DD plus have used your exact tactics you taught me to fight naysayers on a stock. Well as I discovered that teaching to be a falsehood I started saying REMEMBER NEVER disregard a naysyer they might be just telling you the truth. The internet better understand that all their posts can be used against them. I had to copy and supply every post I made to the SEC. PLUS others of key information. Whether you want to believe it or think some excuse for having an opinion or some disclaimer protects you is total nonsense. You are accountable for your posts. PLUS you are accountable for any projections you make which better have an underlying basis along with it. (Economic analysis or Financial analysis) Oh and to sue anyone that makes a complain on you for being a paid promotor to the SEC is nonsense also. I checked on that and that is nonsense also because you have a responsible to the human race to report that which you feel is illegal or crooked or harmful to someone. If I call DFAC and someone is not what I questioned, I cannot be sued because I have a constitution right to make a complain based on my opinion. You have a nice day with your double standards. Gary Swancey