Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Naked Truth - Big Kahuna a Myth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Seaworthy Lyric who wrote (7589)	10/4/1998 9:53:00 PM
From: Joseph G.	Respond to of 86076

I can't predict the future, but at present this seems to be the case. <<everyone is just trying to protect their own neck of the woods>> And it's not surprising, because there are three roughly equal parties, no single party dominates the rest of the world, and nobody feels particularly responsible for the trouble that may or may not become really serious. Fist priority is selfpreservation. Note that no government as a whole considers super high levels of stock markets desirable, nor considers it terribly important what specific levels they trade at. The only exception is a part of US government, namely political parts of the administration, who correctly feel that Clinton's political standing will suffer much should the stocks decline further.