SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kash johal who wrote (38122)10/4/1998 10:58:00 PM
From: Elmer  Respond to of 1571598
 
Re: "The Xeons are poor performers because they are simply dresses up PII cores."

Sorry Kash but you just don't know what you are talking about. Check out:

tpc.org

Check out the comparisons by Price/Performance. Notice how all 10 of the top 10 are Intel boxes? This is why the Xeon is such a threat to Alpha, Sun and IBM etc. Funny, I didn't see any AMD boxes there. Why do you suppose that is?

EP



To: kash johal who wrote (38122)10/4/1998 11:18:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 1571598
 
kash-poor - Re: "the big question is the K7 performance. If it is simply on par with the next generation Xeons, the Intel will still do OK"

So now, everything is prefaced by IF !

I thought you had all the data that confirmed that the K7 would be superior to anything Intel will make.

No data, kash-poor ?

Lots of IF's, kash-poor?

That is VERY DISENGENUOS of you , kash-poor.

No credibility, kash-poor?

Paul


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News