Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LSI Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: uu who wrote (15412)	10/5/1998 9:46:00 AM
From: Michael Grosz	Respond to of 25814

Addi (and everyone obsessed with Clinton), What would us shareholders say if Wilf was caught behaving as our President? Would we not demand his head (pun intended). Remember the thrashing that management took after the 3Q warning? All people could say was that they completely lost faith in the ability of management, and there were calls for Wilf's resignation. Why was this? Because we thought management lied! Well, then again, Wilf is CEO and Clinton is just the President.

To: uu who wrote (15412)	10/5/1998 1:25:00 PM
From: sea_biscuit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25814

Addi: <OT> I understand your point. I have never been comfortable with the Republicans, with the exception of a few rare ones who talk sense, like Tom Campbell, one of the Reps from the Bay Area. And yes, even I will gladly take another 20% down on the S&P 500, if most of the following happen : * Newt, Lott, and a few other high-placed Republicans are dragged to the streets with their pants pulled down! (And with Larry Flynt of "Hustler" magazine offering upto a million for details of every such affair, you can bet that the "Sexual Armageddon" has not yet started). * Starr is disgraced totally and utterly, and vanishes into the oblivion. * Tripp is found guilty of several crimes and is sentenced to jail. * Democrats wrest back the control of the House in the coming elections. Dipy.

To: uu who wrote (15412)	10/5/1998 1:32:00 PM
From: patrick tang	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25814

Way OT: The tactics the Republicans are using are what the Demos/NOW/judiciarys been pioneering the last 30 years to go after men in general - one bimbo who went somewhere at midnight to where she has no business being, turned down a pass, and years later, sues for 'sexual harrassment'. For that charge, the judiciary can go after everything and anything, never remains private. But of course, anything regarding the woman remains hidden so 'we won't punish the woman for going forward'. For that you blame Republicans? Get a grip guys - keep your zippers up, condoms always, and vote Libertarian. If above does not get to you, try this: China - 'communist', 10 to 15% government, no taxes on capital gains/interests/rental income. America - 'capitalist', 40% government, but only if you manage to stay out of the courts. And with >60% marriage failing, that is just about impossible. If you are outraged by Rodney King or OJ or Clintongate, go sit at the nearest 'family court' for half a day to see how the men are getting beat up. If you vote blindly for demos like Barbara Boxer and more men-hating laws get passed, don't blame anybody for it. Nobody should discuss this country's politics until they do some thorough reading on what happened to the laws, ethics or public moralities in America in the last 30 years. If you do that, you might be very amazed that a lot if not all the words that you are using have gotten completely 'deconstructed' over the last 30 years. patrick