To: N. Dixon who wrote (926 ) 10/5/1998 10:11:00 AM From: Mama Bear Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 50146
ND, you have demonstrated an ability to jump to an erroneous conclusion . That post did not detail my criterion for shorting a company, but rather the criterion for the PSO. The PSO is merely a psychological indicator, and something of a joke. It seems you don't really care about details, but are willing to jump to conclusions that benefit you. In this specific case an attempt to discredit my judgement by fooling yourself into thinking that I'm not a particularly smart short seller. You have also demonstrated an ability to dodge the questions that I asked in my previous post. "The only problem is you have not done your due diligence on the current status of product introduction and revenue potential for the company " This company is 34 years old and has produced no meaningful revenue in that time. I never understand why some folks think that if someone comes to a different conclusion that themselves that someone must have not done their ‘due diligence'."you have failed to show how Ailorous can benefit when REFR has the option NOT to sell one share, " This is irrelevant sophistry. REFR has indicated their intention to dilute the float. There is no point in making the agreement, and filing the docs with the SEC if they don't. However, it is equally true that you have not shown how Ailorous will suffer if REFR does not exercise the option to sell."Of course you have put your money on your due diligence " Again, you jump to an incorrect conclusion. I have not yet entered into a short position with REFR. I will have to see if shares are available. If they are, then it is likely that I will. Since you have demonstrated an acute ability to jump to erroneous conclusions, why would I or anyone take your conclusions concerning REFR seriously, especially when my experience shows that your conclusions are likely incorrect? Barb