Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike Gold who wrote (6432)	10/5/1998 8:53:00 AM
From: Handshake™	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25548

Mike, 10% of the voting common could force a proxy vote. We'll kick the tires over the next 48 hours to see what the discussions should be to the shareholders of record. For now, it is important to remember that "they" (whoever "they" are), will probably move this stock up over the next two weeks, coupled with a dog & pony at the agm, should make us lit'l ol investors complacent for a few more months, what else are we gonna do tuck tail between legs and take tax loss. I think its important for shareholders to be convinced that Medinah will not be another CUMO or DBO. ALSO ... Mike, if they have a controlling interest it has to be an indirect interest IE closely held by groups that are believing the stock will improve under current management. If these shares are being held by insiders then they have directly violated the SEC laws (IMO) that I have outlined in my "Sunday reading list". Surely they wouldn't want to violate laws so my guess is... is that many shareholders that are unhappy with recent price activity would be more than receptive to improve Medinah's management team and readily vote for a or a few new board members. What would they have to lose. Of the current float we have been led to believe that many of those recently released shares have gone to land owners. These land owners "if they still own the stock" would certainly love to see a much higher share price. If they sold their shares to some entity closely affiliated with Medinah, then that entity would surely love to see a much higher share price. So ending the rambling, the best thing for shareholders (large & small) is to vote for additional board members. Current management should welcome this endeavor as to enstill a sense of Medinah's longevity and morality. Again...MOO! :-) Geez so early in the morn n to be a preach n!!!

To: Mike Gold who wrote (6432)	10/5/1998 8:56:00 AM
From: J. Nelson	Respond to of 25548

Mike: Re: Smoke & M. There are no Proxies, as the firm would not wish to support our efforts. So states that read. If there were issued (printed forms) Proxies anyone holding the stock could assign it to the one going to the meeting for voting. This way they force the stockholders to act on there own to gather up the info. Seems like that states ha, ha, work for it again folks... Next point is in the amount of shares that were outstanding at the point of our stockholders count. that will be a shock to someone holding a large new fresh hunk of paper! IMO, when someone prints the stock to take voting controll at the last hour it's ah, well let the words fly at the AGM. I have to shut up now as this went a little to far and I'm told to close my mouth. so for I'm out of here on this topic for the present time. Send your votes, Proxies with a yes or no vote to Handshake INT. Vince will carry your vote to the AGM, or someone with the message. This has become out of control IMO, and it's a key to the total float, well see ya. Jim