Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Doughboy who wrote (7806)	10/5/1998 5:31:00 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 13994

talk.techstocks.com Enjoy! JLA

To: Doughboy who wrote (7806)	10/5/1998 5:47:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

>> I think he's full of it on this, and I would wager that the President's numbers bounce back up again before November. His numbers has reacted naturally to the events around him; every release of info brings a downturn, the inevitable pratfall by Congress or Starr brings an uptick. I think Field has seen this before. Remember, Field has the poll's internals and sees the movement. He also knows that Clinton has no reservoir of good will as @70% already believe that he possesses neither the honesty or integrity to serve as President. More and more people realize that he can no longer lead so they will come to the conclusion he cannot serve. I vote in CT. My Rep governor has a 44 point lead over a venerable CT Dem and Representative, Kennelly, whose father headed the party and helped secure JFK's nomination. According to last Friday's latest poll, Rowland has gained 7 more points since Hillary and Bill visited. So John Rowland has the largest lead in CT polling history and stands to win the largest mandate in CT history. Expect the Dems to lose at least one House seat (5th) where the Rep candidate is running as a Rowland protege. The Dems may also lose the eastern House seat.

To: Doughboy who wrote (7806)	10/6/1998 9:58:00 AM
From: j_b	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

<<Field concludes that there are "no signs of reversal." I think he's full of it on this, and I would wager that the President's numbers bounce back up again before November>> If you have no faith in this poll or the pollster, why do you continue to have faith in the polls that show the American people rejecting impeachment? The methodology is the same, the pollster is the same, the person presenting the interpretation is the same. Either they are both accurate, or neither has credibility (I favor the latter).