Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg Cummings who wrote (2025)	10/5/1998 6:07:00 PM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger	Respond to of 3383

3rd time, Gerg: I don't work for FAHN or LEER nor any BD. NEXT subject. Just because TRAV and you are paranoid, does not mean it is true. Yes, I do know that we show our knowledge on trading. I guess we are speaking to the rest of the thread since you & TRAV will refuse to believe the truth. As I have said many times before, we are doing the work of God by protecting widows and orphans from buying this POS. All for now. Tutalew, Gerg.

To: Greg Cummings who wrote (2025)	10/6/1998 10:26:00 AM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3383

Gerg, another technical expert weighs in on AENG, that POS not to be confused with anyting real. To: Auric Goldfinger From: bye-baby-bunting (Trial Member) Tuesday, Sep 29 1998 1:55PM ET FYI, I sent this to Gerg---I really don't expect anything to come of it, but I can't post to the board as a trial member (The Steve Dumbo Clause) ----------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Cummings, I have tried to post technical information regarding the OX2 while I was signed up under a different identification. I then became the subject of ridicule and retorts. I tried to ignore these "threats" and continue on. I met with the same reaction. Asking a legitimate question is not necessarily an attack on AENG, however, you would have thought I was involved in blasphemy by the reaction. I thus monitor this board from the outside (mainly due to new rules within Silicon Investor which does not allow posts except by paying members). While you may find posts by Auric Goldfinger to be lying attacks. I find them to be legitimate litmus tests regarding the solvency of the company. A legitimate response would be a factual reply by an individual who possesses traceable public information regarding such concerns. That eliminates the doubt and places credibility upon the company. No such reply exists. Instead it's just a bunch of name calling, sand kicking, and spitting. Thus, I find that even if both sides use the same tactics, this does not bode well on the corporation. Detractors will always exist, and the burden of truth is on the company. AENG will never gain legitimacy as long as it remains outside of public scrutiny and mainstream technical journals. While your initial post claims you have no ties to this company, you are most certainly their spokesman as far as Silicon Investor is concerned, and that becomes obvious when you take criticism personally. Thus, I doubt your claim of having no ties with the company because you certainly seem to be emotionally invested. I almost bought AENG stock, but I'm glad I didn't. I can wait until it becomes mainstream. I don't need to risk millions on a gamble when I can make hundreds of thousands on a sure bet. Does that make sense? Have a nice day, and please come clean with the facts, because I am very interested to see how this soap opera plays out. Signed, A degreed Mechanical Engineer from Michigan Technological University mtu.edu