Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Brightpoint - CELL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: IndyTom who wrote (1016)	10/5/1998 11:24:00 PM
From: Crusader	Respond to of 1999

I am cautiously optimistic that people are finally realizing the difference between CELL & CLST. CELL closed up a bit today while CLST went further South. I don't wish CLST to do poorly, but I am extremely tired of CELL going down in sympathy with that underperformer. I must agree, no earnings warning by this point should be an extremely positive sign. However, if they do miss then look out below. PLEASE don't miss CELL, my portfolio can't handle any more dead weight. Crusader

To: IndyTom who wrote (1016)	10/6/1998 10:58:00 AM
From: Paul Shread	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1999

Thanks a million, Tom. That was great info and very reassuring. It sure is frustrating that the Street doesn't see how good a company CELL is (I dumped my CLST at 12 1/2, when it became clear to me that their problems were real; it is a continuing source of amazement to me that the Street is incapable of distinguishing between the two companies). I'm looking forward to Oct. 23, when both my CELL and NOK.A will be soaring. Paul

To: IndyTom who wrote (1016)	10/26/1998 9:33:00 AM
From: Paul Shread	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1999

Tom and Brian (or anyone else, for that matter): What would CELL's earnings have been excluding non-recurring SG&A expenses? How did CELL's revenue come in relative to expectations? Thanks in advance. The more I think about it (and I hate to admit I still am), it occurs to me that CELL should be given credit for BEATING estimates. Paul