Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: antibash who wrote (8256)	10/5/1998 8:32:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 26163

The second paragraph means nothing, the shorts have created their own squeeze. Mind explaining the technicals of that? Auntie, Auntie, give it up. You've made a complete fool of yourself over the last few days; why make it worse?

To: antibash who wrote (8256)	10/5/1998 8:53:00 PM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

So you're saying that by not mentioning buying specifically, then JBO and CCC could somehow buy the shares in the First Concorde account, yet remain within the spirit of the injuction by not being involved in any trades with them. Thus, you assert, the order means nothing. (paraphrased from the order):...the defendants J.B. OXFORD and CANACCORD CAPITAL CORPORATION are enjoined from trading, selling, transferring, assigning any or all of the common shares in the capital stock...held to the credit of accounts in the name of the defendant FIRST CONCORDE SECURITIES, LTD. So there's gonna be some buying; just no trading. A buy without a sell? At least, that's what you appear to be saying. Kinda confusing—maybe you can spell it out? What the heck do ya mean Auntie?