Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: j_b who wrote (7493)	10/6/1998 3:42:00 PM
From: pezz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Your response to my comment "your above comment assumes that all Clinton support is just partisan rhetoric" was<<Mostly correct I was probably overstating the case>>Well jb that was down right big of you! Perhaps there is just a teeny weeny fraction of us that disagree with you that are honest debaters.I guess the statement that reasonable people can disagree is ok by you. It's just that those that disagree with you are not reasonable.Well I find many on these threads that I disagree with to be reasonable with arguments that make me think.[this of course does not apply to all]you for one have always fit into the former category.What about dougin's definition of "high crimes and misdemeanors" partisan rhetoric or an honest attempt to demonstrate his position? Is it possible to support BC's agenda and still think that he should stay based on constitutional grounds?I am surprised that you can't see the arrogance of your position here.I am sure that you disagree with this post and I suspect that your disagreement is based on an honest opinion.To bad you can't see fit to afford that respect to most of the rest of us. pez