SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Derivatives: Darth Vader's Revenge -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Henry Volquardsen who wrote (419)10/6/1998 3:00:00 PM
From: Sam  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2794
 
Henry,
"The source of that leverage is large financial institutions and it would be possibly to effectively control hedge funds by exerting capital controls on the banks. I am not advocating this just pointing it out as a potential control lever."
And that is exactly what Alan Greenspan said in his testimony to Congress on the subject. Of course, I doubt if many of those august Members understood what he said. But never mind. They have more important pants to put their hands in.

Of course, then the problem can be that any determined fund might go to, e.g., Panama, the Bahamas, or some other unregulated off-shore financial institution to get their leverage. But in the ripeness of time, those financial institutions may well, if there is justice in the world, be wiped out.



To: Henry Volquardsen who wrote (419)10/6/1998 9:39:00 PM
From: ahhaha  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2794
 
Such controls can't be differentiated from capital that shouldn't be included. You can't segregate the two because the information is internal to banks. If you had a police state, with reviews of all internal bank actions, you still couldn't adequately control actions. Any attempt to do so would increase the black market for money and the increase of offshore loan making. That isn't a desirable end for regulators and revenuers.