SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Machaon who wrote (7912)10/6/1998 3:16:00 PM
From: Zoltan!  Respond to of 13994
 
Thanks.

I could never showcase your ignorance better than you have done yourself. You are a greater distiller of ignorance than most of your ilk. A small monument to ignorance and mendacity.



To: Machaon who wrote (7912)10/6/1998 3:22:00 PM
From: Les H  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13994
 
You sound like the kind of informed voter that Motor Voter Law was designed for...



To: Machaon who wrote (7912)10/6/1998 3:37:00 PM
From: j_b  Respond to of 13994
 
<<I find it amazing that Starr spent $50 million and many years looking for evidence of Clinton's misdeeds, and all he had to do was talk to you!>>

Two minor corrections - according to the GAO, the total spent to date was just over $40 million, of which around $4 million was spent by Starr's predecessor, and around $4 million was the direct result of Clinton's stonewalling (this last part was not from the GAO report). Still a big number, but significantly less than the $50 million you quoted. I believe you are confusing this investigation with the 6 1/2 year $48 million investigation of Iran/Contra, that resulted in no charges being considered by the Democrat Congress against then President Reagan or Bush.

The other point - the investigation was aimed at discovering if any government officials, not just Clinton were involved in crimes. To date, there have been numerous convictions for just such crimes.