Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: j_b who wrote (7602)	10/7/1998 12:45:00 AM
From: pezz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<<which would you rather have a president who lies to you because he really wants to do what he thinks is good for the country even though he knows you don't agree or one who hides a tawdry affair with a subordinate employee his daughters age>> Oh, Oh.Well I know that some one will call me a brain dead moron for this one but...Your first example would be much more scary to me .I am always afraid of people who are so sure of themselves that they feel that lying to others who's opinion is obviously flawed is ok. Remember Ollie North? In no way do I think that he didn't have the best interest of the nation at hart.In your first example I must assume that this president was forced to lie in order to get whatever program he thought was best for the country made into law. This would be a power grab justified because he knew what was best.And he was lying about some thing that I had a right to know the truth about. You already know what I think of the second President. pez