Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JF Quinnelly who wrote (13248)	10/6/1998 8:50:00 PM
From: jhild	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 71178

Well, I think the distinction that you would make about Maryland is not entirely valid. Indeed as a border state it was split in it's loyalties, and indeed the Union abetted the loyal sympathizers in controlling the state, even suspending habeas corpus, for the strategic reasons that you mention. But as it turned out there was a majority of Marylanders that were with the Union. The plight of joining one side or the other was visited on the minority elements in most border states, so I think to say that the Marylanders couldn't join their southern kin applied no less than to Virginians believing in the Union, and to an even a larger degree Unionists in Tennessee. (Kentucky was a bit of a toss up as I recall.) Indeed Abe was a fairly end justifies the means kind of guy, though it was a civil war after all. I have relatives that moved for instance at the beginning of the war from Shenandoah to Ohio for this very reason.