SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Investor A who wrote (38504)10/6/1998 9:52:00 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1586212
 
Re: "I guess that you might never thought of the possibilities to get a recycled Xeon which was flawed in chip designs and would fail at high core speeds, such as 450Mhz, under strict testings."

FuchiWu-RayW-Sherlie-IncestorA:

Fuchi, we've been through this before. If you are going to claim that a Xeon that won't run at 450mhz is flawed then you must accept that every chip ever shipped by AMD is a flawed version of it's next higher speedbin. Every K6x ever built will fail under strict test conditions at 450mhz so are you claiming that AMD is ripping off their customers with each and every part they sell? I think you should ask your nurse for assistance on this one. She's there to help you.

BTW, we really missed you. We were very worried when we hadn't heard from you in so long. We were afraid that maybe some technician fell asleep at the switch when you were getting your electro-shock treatment and ... well... you can imagine what went through our minds. Nice to see you back...

Your Pal,

Elmer



To: Investor A who wrote (38504)10/7/1998 1:21:00 AM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 1586212
 
Fuchi Wu - Re: "you are ripped off by Intel again"

Please tell us all how you were ripped off by Cyrix when you "backed up the truck" to buy it at $42/share 2 1/2 years ago.
Isn't it now at $8 equivalent?

Guess what Intel's stock has done since then, Fluchi?

Paul