To: Dean Dumont who wrote (8430 ) 10/6/1998 11:16:00 PM From: wonk Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26163
bgtit: You never responded to this:exchange2000.com Tell me about the plan to convert insider common to preferred. Who recommended it? Has it been implemented? OH BTW, since you do have a relationship with AZNT, I believe you are required to mention that every time. ...At that moment there became a business relationship established with Mike and AZNT. it has nothing to do with the market, and as for compensation, sign a non-compete non-disclosure agreement and you can read it. #reply-5773766 You comment about having a business relationship which has nothing to do with the market is a non-sequitor. Since you do have a relationship, and you do claim that the court order posted is false, then perhaps you should post the relevant language from the order "here on my desk." Before you say no, perhaps you should read this again:General Rules and Regulations promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 10b-5. Employment of Manipulative and Deceptive Devices.It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, by the use of any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails or of any facility of any national securities exchange, a. To employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud, b. To make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, or c. To engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security. law.uc.edu ww