Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jafco who wrote (7827)	10/7/1998 1:13:00 AM
From: SnakeInATuxedo	Respond to of 14226

No, it isn't "insider" information, at least not from the point of view of, say, the SEC vis-a-vis the Company. But if, indeed, someone who was not an officer of the court were in possession of knowledge of a Cease and Desist Order before its service on the Company in question, that person, by their knowledge of its existence and then disclosure of it, would be breaking the law, and a district attorney in the jurisdiction where the Cease and Desist Order was issued should be actively looking into the matter, because our little Peripatetic, Hyperkinetic Hobgoblin has broken the law. Never fails, give 'em enough rope, and they'll always hang themselves with it. Now, if the investigation were to also reveal for whom PHH was acting as sycophantic toadie, things could really get interesting.