SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Trump's 12 Diamond Picks, Discussions Limited -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: VAUGHN who wrote (1306)10/7/1998 12:30:00 PM
From: Rick the Vet  Respond to of 2251
 
Thanks for the valuable bit of information. Looks like CC may be looking to accumulate instead of the usual pump and dump.
Regards



To: VAUGHN who wrote (1306)10/7/1998 1:01:00 PM
From: Tomato  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2251
 
I was trying to figure out a value per share
of WSP based on that David James report
posted by VAUGHN. See if these figures check out..

In Situ Value: $400/tonne X 3.5 mil tonnes = $1,400mil
Less $87/tonne operating costs - 304
Less capital costs - 104
Net value 991.5
WSP's 67% share 664
Divided by 37 mil shares fully diluted 17.95/sh

or another way to do it...

In Situ Value: $400/tonne X 3.5 mil tonnes = $1,400mil
WSP share of 67% 938
Less 67% of $104m capital costs - 70
less 67% of $87/tonne operating costs -204
Net value 664
Divided by 37 mil shares 17.95

Then you'd have to discount at the rate for treasury
bills or however the hell they do it- %5 or something-
I don't understand that part of the equation.
Too bad we couldn't get Gabriela to do that- he
was good at that kind of thing. ;-)> But
it seems they're lowballing the value/tonne and it seems
to me they're using 67% as a figure when it's closer
to 68% of the project that WSP has. Also, they're not
finished drilling and expanding the resource by any
stretch of the imagination....So unless the bulk sample
shows that the mini bulk sample was an aberration, we're
in fat city.