Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : RECY Looking Good... A -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Siber who wrote (5967)	10/7/1998 12:25:00 PM
From: James Strauss	Respond to of 7006

>>>As you are well aware, stock prices are based on potential of a company. Since June RECY has gone from 6 to 1, since June CWST has gone from 25 to 30 with a high not too long ago of 34. Which company has potential, Jim?<<< ********************************************************************** John: My focus is on the long term... But let's look at the short term... Let's look at today... CWST is down almost 9% today... RECY is up over 9% today... Does this mean that CWST has less potential than RECY? We need to look at stock comparisons over years to see how effective management really is... In the short term anything can happen... stocksheet.com CWST Current Ratio is flashing a warning signal... RECY has a very health Current Ratio... With Disney and Citibank and Cisco down, do we say they don't have potential because a market cycle goes against them... I don't think so... You look at their execution of their business plan and the people doing the executing... Jim

To: Siber who wrote (5967)	10/7/1998 1:22:00 PM
From: wpckr	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7006

Jim! You are saying in effect that there is no crash until there is a sudden stop. That is only true in physical situations. What we are trying to tell you is that RECY comes with inordinate risk. I believe, as others do, that this company, perhaps through only partial fault on its own, has encountered forces from the outside that are diametrically counter to their basic business plan and they are far enough along in that plan to be facing bankruptcy due to the outside negative forces. IMHO you best be reduced to minimum core holding until the business climate turns more friendly and until the progress of the company is more positive in the profit(NET) area. I hate this, Jim, but I would hate worse to get hurt or see you or your followers get hurt. BE PRUDENT!! GOOD LUCK!!