Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mark silvers who wrote (16582)	10/7/1998 4:49:00 PM
From: Neal davidson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

I think that after a few factual and legal questions are answered, we would have to form a small committee to see if we could find competent counsel to represent us. The interests of everyone should be represented on the committee (ie: those who bought the last PP, those who did not, but relied on Ledoux, etc.)...then we need to discuss our goals, how many shareholders want to participate, whether it should be a class-action suit, etc. I guess we would also have to discuss whether Naxos would be an appropriate defendant, either because they are not suing Ledoux or for other potential malfeasance. I know there is disagreement amongst shareholders as to Naxos' culpability in the Ledoux fiasco. I have already stated my opinion that it was reasonable for management to rely on Ledoux. If someone can tell me why I am wrong (without relying on 20/20 hindsight) I am all ears.