To: The Philosopher who wrote (7280 ) 10/7/1998 5:31:00 PM From: Michael T Currie Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15313
> I fear you are letting reality intrude on irrational exhuberance. Good one, although I've never considered myself particularly guilty of IE. > One thing you failed to mention: while FNTN needs Siemens, and Siemens has certainly said nice things, there does not appear to be any contract or legal relationship that Siemens couldn't sever in a matter of moments if they chose to. Excellent point, although you have to wonder what is signed and what's not. I get the strong impression that there is quite a bit going on behind the scenes that we do not know about. Whether good or bad is impossible to say. Does Siemens really need FNTN or is FNTN a convenient outlet for their technology? > Those who tout the Siemens relationship as the saving grace of FNTN may not be recognizing the very high risk that goes with that. Personally, I would prefer to see FNTN making it on its own without needing to rely on one big brother. But for now, that's the way it is, and I suspect that those people with green eyeshades realize it and are factoring that into the perceived value. Absolutely correct regarding the risk factor here, but as you pointed out, there is a strong potential positive side to this. I work with a lot of high tech companies. To pick one at random - Schlumberger. This company has probably been responsible for more successes and failures in the oil service industry than any in history. They leave the carcasses of the failures by the roadside after sucking them dry of their technological expertise. The success cases, which to be fair certainly outnumber the others, are usually acquired. Once again, we are not privy to Seimens' motives, but on balance, I think I would much rather have them in the picture than out.