Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lazarre who wrote (7862)	10/7/1998 9:55:00 PM
From: j_b	Respond to of 67261

<<From the NY Times, no friend of the Prez:>> Except for the Washington Times and a couple of others, the major newspapers (L.A. and N.Y. Times and the Post, especially) have always shown a decidedly liberal bias, IMHO. Why do you think they have all turned on Clinton? Notice they still have the same bias toward liberal social programs, still print mostly anti-gun pieces when on that topic, etc. It's only when it comes to Clinton that they turn.

To: lazarre who wrote (7862)	10/7/1998 10:46:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Sure is easy to assassinate someone's character and reputation when your comments are not attributed by name. Who are these "trade attorneys" who are so familiar with Klayman? Why aren't their names in the article you posted? Of course witnesses complain. No one likes to be sued or even involved in a lawsuit. Point is Klayman's investigations have made a lot of progress in getting at the truth about a number of Clinton scandals. The Courts have sanctioned DOJ lawyers twice in cases involving Klayman. No arguing that point I see. JLA