SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul V. who wrote (25054)10/8/1998 9:49:00 AM
From: akidron  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
Paul, my point is simple, the market has far further of fall, and AMAT's no hedge, in fact there are few.... maybe healthcare, entertainment... but in truth I think everything's going down... look I've been saying the same stuff for months, but let's be real, the japanese say they're gonna stimulate the economy, but they'll have to flush it first, because it's like putting a turbo on a wreck right now. And the effect has been to send the $ down 15% which puts further rates cuts in jepordy... as how hard is the $ really. The point is that we are seeing a huge dislocation of markets right now, and the also is the bulls like AJC are speaking with forked tonges... the bull market is in place yet they're slashing earnings estimates. I hate the term a suckers rally, because one can make good money in the bounces, but there is simply no reason to be cheerfull right now. Whether 6 nore funds own amat now than last week is neither here nor there, so six more value funds are getting there feet wet early... So what? they're wrong. The PC is the symbol of our economic expansion, its about to become the victim of obesity and contraction.



To: Paul V. who wrote (25054)10/8/1998 1:20:00 PM
From: Debt Free  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
Paul you said

"Could you explain why the funds owning amat has increased to 378 in the Tuesday IBD? This is up 6 from 9/28."

Do you know if the amount owned by the funds has been increasing or decreasing? I think that would be a better indicator than the number of funds owning.

TIA

Doug