Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (7884)	10/7/1998 11:20:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Still have yet to see any refutation of the post you like to cite as a classic. Which part did you take issue with? Character counts? Your prowess as cutting and pasting the posts of those you disagree with is now renowned. Do you think that impresses anyone? JLA

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (7884)	10/8/1998 5:17:00 AM
From: Who, me?	Respond to of 67261

Daniel, thanks for the post!!! I'd forgotten some of the wise posts from Mr. K and JLA! Kept me from going back and looking them up!!! PS to Mr. K and JLA: Keep up the good work! You make a lot of sense!

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (7884)	10/8/1998 9:16:00 AM
From: mrknowitall	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Dan - thank you for filling in in my absence. The post is a fitting example of what I was talking about in the "no-defense" defense - no matter what the argument or topic is, throw out something to divert the reader. Mr. Clinton is a proven liar. Lying is not an event, it is a behavioral trait. When behavioral traits are acted upon without penalty, they are reinforced. Now the "no-defense" defense: It doesn't matter because of what he lied about; everybody does it; Starr is out of control; We've spent $200 million in trying to "get" Bill Clinton out of office; the RR is dangerous; what about Iran Contra? No matter how many times you cut and paste the diversionary WH spin machine dogma, you'll notice it never attempts to refute the fact that the President is dishonest. Dan, can you find someone who is standing up and saying that Bill Clinton's honesty is above reproach? Thanks again, Mr. K.