Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Maxam Gold Corp. OBB:MXAM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: WLAVEL who wrote (5934)	10/8/1998 8:08:00 AM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11603

WL, the "bucket" I was referring to was Maxam's internal test were they found good metal concentrations near the drill hole (see the AGM tape). The COC of fire assay nil was consistent with the bulk test results. Hard to get metals from ore without metal, the COC leach testing had instrumentation problems. Runyon says that the bulk test was on the worst possible location. You either believe him or you don't. The Maxam desert dirt ore always shows higher leach recovery than fire assay based on experimental result. <<You guys level with everyone and play a little hardball with MAXAM and you just might get them moving toward something positive>> You can do your due dilly any way you want. What makes you think I have any responsibility to direct Maxam or educate you? Maxam management is running the operation not us, we either invest or not. Giving us responsibility or authority not ours is ridiculous.