Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Techteam who wrote (16165)	10/8/1998 9:21:00 AM
From: SKIP PAUL	Respond to of 152472

I dont want to speak for Greg but that is not what I read in his posts. He was disputing your $5 yo $7 per handset number, which you still have not explained.

To: Techteam who wrote (16165)	10/8/1998 9:22:00 AM
From: Gregg Powers	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Techteam: Since I am not some twenty-something wunderkind at Fido, I am struggling to deduce where and when I opined on the $65mm in Korean royalties. That number is clearly too high and irrelevant to the point that I was making. Are you suggesting that because somebody (inaccurately) projected Korean royalties aggregating to $65mm this quarter, you have a mandate to understate the company's per-handset royalty realization and foist equally nonsensical statistics on the Forum's audience? One mistake begets another? A fallacious quid pro quo? Hmmm. Try again. Gregg