Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9 who wrote (70288)	10/8/1998 10:42:00 AM
From: Dr. David Gleitman	Respond to of 176387

INTL up 1 3/16 Maybe their's still some hope. But I still want my Inspiron 7000. David PS: this may look like we passed the bottom. This can represent a tremendous buying opportunity.

To: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9 who wrote (70288)	10/8/1998 10:49:00 AM
From: divvie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 176387

I think it's fair to say that you've carried this on a bit too far. Zurdo was posting to freeus about shorts panicking or something, and you came in implying that he was talking about you. You then constructed a series of semantic arguments that really did look as if you like arguments. Nothing wrong with that (I also tend to post like you sometimes), but don't labor under the illusion that this was about your views. Your posts started to deconstruct what you had said and became only about what you said. It all became rather circular, which this is becoming so I'll stop now.

To: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9 who wrote (70288)	10/8/1998 10:54:00 AM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 176387

Sorry Lisa, You did not understand the post. I did not consider whether you were short or long when I wrote the post and I did not accuse you in any way, explicitly or implied that you were a short or attempting any manipulation. Nor did I say that absent of a detailed explanation implies manipulation. In fact, I pointed to Lucretious as an example of a person who was not providing details and I did not believe was manipulative. You had posed a question to Venkie that was rebuffed and I thought you deserved a reasonable answer, which I thought I had offered. Nothing more, nothing less. My apologies, if I unintentionally offended you. Best Regards, Jim