Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (8159)	10/8/1998 3:52:00 PM
From: Borzou Daragahi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Michelle, I can't really blame the Dems in close races for voting with their future electoral prospects in mind. They are just lowering their ethical bar to the dismal nadir of our careerist, opportunist president.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (8159)	10/8/1998 3:54:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

OK, so, if the DEMS vote in lockstep, they're voting their conscience, if the REPS do, then they are partisan, and those low life cross-over guys, well, they are just looking out for their own skin.....right!!!! Imagine that! BTW, it would seem counterintuitive for them to be considering only their re-election, remember those Pro-Clinton polls<g>......bp

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (8159)	10/8/1998 5:46:00 PM
From: j_b	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

<<With regards to the Dems, they are the lowest still because (I believe) they are voting not with their conscience, not with their party, but with their future reelection in mind.>> Are you saying that the only reason for a Democrat voting for hearings would be to appease voters? There couldn't possibly be any that really think hearings are the right way to go? Voting for hearings is not the same as voting for articles of impeachment. I think a goodly portion of the Democrats voting for hearings truly believe it's the right thing to do.