Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ironyman who wrote (13969)	10/8/1998 9:57:00 PM
From: John Finley	Respond to of 34075

Wow, some good news today!! I needed it. The only stocks I have that are up today are ATML and MINE! Helluva week. JF

To: Ironyman who wrote (13969)	10/8/1998 10:38:00 PM
From: the Chief	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 34075

Hi eric. In defence of my fellow Canadians, this statement is not true. What has been discussed is that the standards have been raised since that """Canadian Company """ did a ' Tap Dance ' on the gold market. The International Mining standard for establishing "proven", "probable" "inferred", "indicated" has not changed. What has changed is the information that "exchanges" want! If the sampling was done in accordance with the IMS and sampling records were kept, as all projects are supposed to have (even pre-Bre-X) than GE should have had no problem in fulfilling the requirements!! NONE!! In GE's case, "Guido's techniques" (love that!) were not up to the IM Standard, as stated by TT last week, and "me" 3 months ago! I will make a prediction here; 1) Guido's techniques did not meet the IMS 2) BD is going down and do sampling to verify there is gold and that the concentrations are there 3) Even if confirmed, then #1 rears its ugly head and the proven is no longer "proven" and the inferred is no longer inferred and the indicated is no longer indicated. 4) If not confirmed than "the appropriateness of BD's report will be brought into question by GE! 5) Because sampling which is "inconsistent" at best, (grab sampling) further sampling will be required ! the chief

To: Ironyman who wrote (13969)	10/8/1998 11:50:00 PM
From: CIMA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

Eric, the CIMA Fund Trip to Bolivia is achieving more than I ever imagined. We have had more news out of GE in a few days than we've had for months. First, the Ron Knittle outburst against Sun River. Then news of an authorized trip by GE coming up with John Carperelli (my suggestion to TT) whose clients hold more than 10M GE shares (according to John) and possibly other friendly GE posters from the threads. Following that GE allows the independent reps of the small investors an audience at the La Paz office. And now an 8K that finally informs the small investor of the current status of the company. Amazing what happens when shareholders take an active role in completing due diligence.