SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Justa & Lars Honors Bob Brinker Investment Club -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mister topes who wrote (1513)10/9/1998 1:12:00 AM
From: Hank Stamper  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15132
 
don,

Maybe she subscribes.

He may be cheaper but I'll bet she's a lot prettier. Probably uses them beauty aids Justa and Lars sell on the side.

Hey Justa. Lars! I wonder if Brinker would take advertising copy. You two could take out a full page advert in Marketimer and probably make a bundle from the sales response.

Ciao,
David Todtman




To: mister topes who wrote (1513)10/9/1998 9:52:00 AM
From: Lars  Respond to of 15132
 
Don,

>>>
Remember those posts that claimed that AJC was a Marketimer
subscriber and she simply copies the predictions in Marketimer
and used them for her GS forecasts? Well, guess what.
On Thursday AJC reduced her 1998 estimated S & P 500
operating earnings number to $49.00, which is the EXACT
number Brinker is using in Marketimer!!!
And she also lowered her 1999 estimate to $52.50, which
is now just $1.00 above Marketimer's 1999 forecast.
Imagine, GS could save all that money they pay her
by simply subscribing to Marketimer and using the numbers
therein. And for this they call AJC a market guru?
>>>
It is obvious she is a subscriber to Marketimer imho. This is beyond coincidence.

Facts speak for themselves. Bob is the only guru and he has the history to prove it. Plus, he has done more for the small investor than AJC could ever hope to. Period.



To: mister topes who wrote (1513)10/9/1998 5:46:00 PM
From: Justa Werkenstiff  Respond to of 15132
 
don: Re: "Remember those posts that claimed that AJC was a Marketimer
subscriber and she simply copies the predictions in Marketimer
and used them for her GS forecasts?"

Yes, and did you ever notice that AJC does not do television interviews on the weekends? And I will tell you, just between you and me, AJC is on our mailing list and orders quite frequently from our catalog.

Re: "Well, guess what. On Thursday AJC reduced her 1998 estimated S & P 500 operating earnings number to $49.00, which is the EXACT number Brinker is using in Marketimer!!! And she also lowered her 1999 estimate to $52.50, which is now just $1.00 above Marketimer's 1999 forecast."

Yep, it sure took her long enough. Brinker was out with his forecasts at the beginning of September. I guess she gets her issue of Marketimer on a delayed basis or goes to the library to get the straight dope. Glad I am on the Federal Express delivery priority list so I know what AJC is going to say before she does.

Re: "Imagine, GS could save all that money they pay her by simply subscribing to Marketimer and using the numbers therein. And for this they call AJC a market guru?"

Oh, dono, I love it when you are trash talking. In your face, AJC!!! I think the Brink can take her. Bring her on!!!



To: mister topes who wrote (1513)10/12/1998 4:37:00 PM
From: jjs_ynot  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15132
 
Elaine Garzarelli has issued a buy signal and stated that the bottom is in. Is this a contrary indicator?