Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications (ASND) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bucky89 who wrote (55623)	10/9/1998 1:32:00 AM
From: Tim Luke	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 61433

i'm quite sure xyln would fill their needs for a lot less dollars then coms.....

To: bucky89 who wrote (55623)	10/9/1998 10:07:00 AM
From: drdan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 61433

but what about the fact that xyln switches are embedded with the qudt software? Does LU buy a company apart from xyln and start screwing around with fitting the qudt goods say,with a COMS product? also consider what happens to the strategic agrement between xyln and qudt if LU won't buy xyln or use their switches....you can't just back out of a contract(presumably) It seems to me that LU would at least form a strategic partnership with xyln so they can contine to have a complete qudt product to sell. Do they have the luxury to do otherwise?