SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Jabil Circuit (JBL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: kolo55 who wrote (4597)10/9/1998 7:43:00 AM
From: Ron Kory  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6317
 
Paul and others:

There were worse selloffs this century than 1987: 1929 and 1974 are
two examples and they each had their own reasons. 1987 also had good
reasons to selloff albeit it was exacerbated by portfolio insurance.

It is interesting that this board is even having a discussion on the
bear market. Possibly this is a bullish thing. On this score it is
interesting to note Newsweek's bear market cover ("The Crash of '99")
this week, Esquire's cover ("What did you do in the crash, Daddy?"),
the front page coverage given to the market's turbulence in the
nation's newspapers, the lead in the national television news reports
etc. The bad news is now completely ingrained in the nation's psyche.

The average Nasdaq stock is down well over 50% from its highs and
average NYSE stock is down 40%. The Russel index of small cap stocks
is down 37% with a 17% decline just since September 29. During 1987
the Russell declined 39% from its extreme high to extreme low.

My point here is that we are well into the bear market and may be
closer to the end than many think--at least we may finally achieve
a point of equillibrium where buyers can match sellers and the market
can become more stable.

Obviously the market can go down more. In 1974 the average stock
declined 70% from its highs which would indicate much more to go. One
could argue that there is vicious tax loss selling going on because
as long time blue chip winners are sold losers are sold to offset
taxable gains. Selling into a vaccuum is making most smaller stocks
crater. In my mind this is creating the conditions for small cap
outperformance whenever the market does regain its footing (easier
for the stock that went from 15 to 5 to bounce back to 10 as opposed
to Hershey Food to go from 74 to 150).

In every bear market there are winners and bear markets frequently
alter the next leadership groups for the next bull market. Perhaps
JBL and SLR's recent outperformance are paving the way for their
leadership. No doubt JBL can go lower but this significant outperformance and outright appreciation is telling a tale that should
be respected.

ron



To: kolo55 who wrote (4597)10/11/1998 12:43:00 PM
From: gs  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6317
 
>>I think Cramer's comments are way off base, and particularly childish, and so far, very poorly timed. Of course, he's not a long term thinker; he can and could change his mind tomorrow at the slightest tide change. <<

Great observation. That exactly what makes him a good trader.

If you a trader you do not and should not have any opinion, your goal is to follow the market.