To: Bill who wrote (8388 ) 10/9/1998 10:30:00 AM From: Daniel Schuh Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
BTW, I never quoted a real poll. That was your word. I merely told you Clinton was a joke, as evidenced by SNL and the nightly Jay Leno skits. Now if you want to make them a scientific poll, that's your free speech, pal. But I never said you "quoted a real poll". You did use the word, though. No, the polls suggest that Clinton is the joke. At least that's how Leno and SNL are making their money recently. Oops, you said polls , not poll , with respect to your favored indicators of public opinion. Sorry for the misstatement. Anyway, I sarcastically responded:Now, does SNL go out and do a poll before they write their sketches? Using scientific polling techniques that you approve of, no doubt. SNL is pretty tasteless most of the time, anyway, I'm sure they'll get around to chief righteous moral inquisitor Ken Starr in due time. Somehow, I don't think you'll be reporting that here. You responded, polite and tasteful as ever:With presidential sperm squirting all over the Oval office and dripping on Clinton's head, as was shown on SNL last night, you still don't know who the NATIONAL JOKE is? You are a true moron. This is leaving aside the other matter, where I've presented certain facts, including direct quotes, from Bush indicating he did indeed testify for the special prosecutor, and from Walsh saying he thought he could have made a perjury case against Bush, if Bush hadn't pardoned everybody as a parting gift, and you just keep screaming "liar, you made it all up". But of course, you're the one that's into "substance" and "facts". As opposed to "feelings" and "emotions", not to mention "partisan hatred". I know you are a true believer in free speech, of course. And you're doing your very best to elevate the level of dialogue here too. Thank you for sharing.