SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (8453)10/9/1998 2:49:00 PM
From: Les H  Respond to of 67261
 
They've indicated that the investigations are still ongoing by Starr into these other areas. As in Watergate, Congress will likely look into these other scandals regardless of whether Starr delivers more reports. Starr isn't the only source for investigations.



To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (8453)10/9/1998 3:01:00 PM
From: Machaon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
<< ... if Starr couldn't come up with any evidence worth reporting, what makes you think the House investigation is going to do better? >>

Why is this so confusing to our conservative friends. The Democrats wanted to limit the scope to only those issues that would come from the Starr investigation. The fact that the House wants to extend it past the Starr investigation indicates clearly that they are conducting a witch hunt.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News