SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WavePhore (WAVO)- VBI fed WaveTop for WebTV -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bald Man from Mars who wrote (1863)10/13/1998 5:12:00 PM
From: Kevin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2843
 
I wrote to "our boys" yesterday. What follows is their prompt response which some of you may find of interest. BTW, Patrick Gilbert (of WAVO) gave me approval to post his response on this forum. Pay paticlular attention to the last paragraph about the Starr report - very cool!

Your email has been forwarded to me by customer support and Jennifer Schreier, our Director of investors relations.

About our dependency on Microsoft

Microsoft is an important partner of WavePhore specifically for WaveTop, however, we are not dependent on MSFT for the success of WaveTop. As you know WaveTop is included in Windows 98 and we have no reason to believe this agreement would be affected in any way in the event of a ruling against Microsoft. WaveTop does use IE as its browser, but even if Microsoft was forced to remove the icon from the desktop, WaveTop would still work as it uses the "IE engine" not necessarily the visible part. That engine is part of the operating system and cannot be removed : in fact it is used by a number of applications (even non-Microsoft products) such as Outlook 98,
Money, Quicken, the AOL browser, to name a few.

WaveTop is also available as a standalone product through download and CDs, and in this case it does include IE as part of the package. This version of WaveTop would not be affected by a ruling against Microsoft either.

About cable modems

WaveTop is a data broadcasting service designed to complement, not to compete with point-to-point services such ISPs using modems or cable modems. By nature, broadcasting will always be a more efficient way to distribute the same information to a large audience than point-to-point solutions because it requires a lot less infrastructure and bandwidth. At the same time, broadcasting is not suitable for email or other type of two-way communication. This is why WaveTop is a complement to the "wired Internet".

The current instance of WaveTop, using the VBI as the delivery mechanism, complements the primary way home PC users access the internet : a 28.8/56Kbps modem. While WaveTop has a similar delivery speed, it reaches potentially millions of users at the same time, something impossible over phone lines. Cable modems are now available, but in very small numbers compared to modems. While they offer higher speed, they are still not better than broadcast for mass distribution applications. WaveTop will also migrate to higher bandwidth with the rollout of DTV. It will have a delivery speed similar to cable modems, but still operate in broadcast mode.

You could say that what WaveTop - VBI is to a modem, WaveTop - DTV will be to cable modems, the perfect complement.

As a final note to illustrate the power of broadcasting : recently, when the Starr report was released, using a cable modem did not increase your chances to connect to overloaded server at the White House or any news organization (more than 85% of the requests were not served). As soon as the report was released, EVERY WaveTop user got it instantly without having to connect, with no wait : it was simply there on their PCs, waiting for them to read it at their leisure (assuming the were interested ...). That's the advantage of WaveTop : one-to-many distribution of digital information.

I hope this will answer your questions. Thanks for your support as an investor, and please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any additional questions.

Sincerely,

Patrick Gilbert
V-P and CTO
WavePhore WaveTop, Inc.



To: Bald Man from Mars who wrote (1863)11/1/1998 9:31:00 AM
From: AJ Berger  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2843
 
PBS says Value Adding VBI may compete with future HDTV

HDTV launches,
plagued by major
concerns

By Robert Lemos
10/30/98 08:51:00 PM
Digital TV arrives on Sunday, but
despite its high-quality picture,
high-definition television's future is
extremely fuzzy.

The problem? Companies are discovering
quickly that there are better ways to use
their precious allocated frequency
spectrum than producing an ultra-crisp
picture.

"The consensus is that HDTV -- to a large
extent -- is going to be put on the back burner," said Josette Bonte,
vice president of new media and entertainment practice at media
researcher Ryan Hankin Kent Inc. "The trend seems to be towards
broadcasting regular digital TV and then using the rest of the
spectrum for other types of content." On Sunday, at the behest of
the Federal Communications Commission, 23 stations in the top 10
broadcast markets will start transmitting high-definition digital TV
signals. The Nov. 1 rollout marks the beginning of the move to digital
TV, due to be completed in 2006, at which time analog TV spectrum
reverts to the government.

What's wrong with this picture?
Even with the FCC prodding the industry with a regulatory spear,
industry players have doubts about the medium.

It's a matter of money, said Steve Guggenheimer, product manager
for Microsoft Corp.'s digital TV group.

The bandwidth is free, but the cost of the equipment is not. "Every
camera, every broadcast tower and every receiver in the home has
to be changed," said Guggenheimer. Total tally: about $100 billion
over 10years.

Facing that hefty number, the industry needs a product that is
guaranteed to make money -- and Guggenheimer maintains that
HDTV is not it. "If you are only providing more definition, you are not
giving the advertiser any more value," he said.

One analyst disagreed. "More realistic ads could be worth more,"
said Josh Bernoff, an analyst at market watcher Forrester Research
Inc. "If the medium can show what it is like driving in, say, a Ford
Explorer, then that may be worth something."

Still, the audience is not biting. To date, only a handful of
consumers have actually shelled out the $7,000 to $15,000 for an
HDTV. "It's like the tree falling in the forest -- no one is around to
hear it," said Cynthia Brumfield, senior analyst with new media
watcher Paul Kagan Associates Inc.

Less definition, more vision
PC industry giants Intel Corp. and Microsoft (Nasdaq:MSFT), which
abandoned independent plans, are now working with the TV industry
finding ways to capitalize on the move to digital. But their plans
don't necessarily support HDTV, which takes up the entire spectrum
with video, and does not allow for other kinds of information to be
transmitted simultaneously.

Last Monday, Intel (Nasdaq:INTC) announced that it would be
working with public TV network PBS to stream more than 300MB of
additional data during the Nov. 10 and 11 broadcast of Ken Burns's
documentary on Frank Lloyd Wright.

The additional content will include interviews with Wright by CBS
correspondent Mike Wallace, recorded in the 1950s; virtual tours of
three historic Wright creations: Fallingwater, the Guggenheim
Museum and Unity Temple; and additional footage and other content
not included in the documentary.

"The marriage of broadband digital delivery and powerful computing
devices enables something better than TV and better than the
Internet," said Ron Whittier, senior vice president, Intel's content
group, in a statement.

"The PC companies have always been a proponent of adding
interactive content to digital TV," said RHK's Bonte. "If HDTV fails to
take off, they win."

The lion that squeaked
Even if HDTV fizzles out, digital TV is destined to be everywhere.

"TV stations gain a host of benefits from digital TV," said Brumfield.
"Primary among them is flexibility." TV broadcasters can add
interactive content to the broadcast, compress the programming to
fit multiple channels in a single allocated piece of the TV spectrum,
or create additional services such as video-on-demand.

Which way will they go? So far, not even the broadcasters know.
"We are working with a variety of formats," said Kevin Dando,
spokesman for public broadcaster PBS.

For the next few years, bet hedging will be the sport of choice
among broadcasters.

"It is too early to tell if high-definition TV will be more successful
than interactivity on the TV," said Guggenheimer. "For the next few
years, there will be trials of all the formats