Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : INPR - Inprise to Borland (BORL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mark Bracey who wrote (1346)	10/9/1998 5:37:00 PM
From: Bipin Prasad	Respond to of 5102

Don't you hate those lawyers? OOOps, Bipin's daddy is one and so is my buddy. But technically they are not "those" lawyers. So they won't get mad at me, I hope. In Korean, there's saying that "Don't kill the dog to get rid of a flea." later, InSook

To: Mark Bracey who wrote (1346)	10/9/1998 10:59:00 PM
From: Charles Hughes	Respond to of 5102

How about this: Make it a felony for any politician or ranking government employee to lie or otherwise act to mislead the public substantially about any matter of state, federal, or local government.. This would eliminate the questions about other matters that are none of our business. The press would have lots to report on, the government would change in many ways, and in general politicians would talk less. A special branch of the Judiciary could be set up to handle this. The law could be drawn to provide due process, unlike what Clinton is getting. Perhaps we would need a constitutional amendment, but that could be done. Once proposed, which politicians could publicly oppose it?