Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: j_b who wrote (8574)	10/9/1998 5:43:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Well... I didnt hear the debate, but This Week in N California said that Davis backed Lundgren into a corner in the last debate and the papers are still running with the quotes regarding Letrell Sprewell (sp?) etc. So, he doesnt want to halt that momentum. All the papers Ive read said Davis won. Do you agree?

To: j_b who wrote (8574)	10/9/1998 6:15:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Respond to of 67261

>> The logic here escapes me Your implication is correct. The Dems want no more debates because their candidate has faced nothing but decline as a result of the previous debates. Davis may be gray but he isn't stupid. Davis doesn't want any more debates because Lungren is a skilled debater and Davis is a feckless speaker. The results of the past debates has been a steady erosion in Davis support and momentum for Lungren. Davis peaked too early just like Kathleen Brown did four years ago. Republicans always pick up support as the elections near, especially in California.