Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StockMan who wrote (8677)	10/9/1998 8:25:00 PM
From: Who, me?	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Then why don't you call up CNBC and tell those lawyers on there that just said it! I repeated it here the way it was said which was, if at a later date, Bennett discovered that his client had made false statements to the court, it was his responsibility to correct it with THE COURT!!! I love you too, honey!!!

To: StockMan who wrote (8677)	10/9/1998 10:22:00 PM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Stockman, re >Get lost idiot< That is no way to speak to a lady, even if she has opposing political views. You have repeatedly insulted and denegrated Who me?, and in return she has treated you very civily and with more patience and good humor than you deserved; yet you continued to be rude to her. Even though I, as a fundamentalist rightwing conservative, have for the most part opposing views from the outspoken Ms. Harris, I don't think I ever spoke so crudely as you have with Who me?, though of course Ms. Harris may well recall many instances where I was indeed impatient and blunt. You show a strikingly weak male ego to have to stoop to these kinds of personal base attacks on a member of the fair sex.