SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Environmental Remediation Hldg Corp. (ERHC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Andy who wrote (500)10/11/1998 12:12:00 AM
From: RG  Respond to of 671
 
There is no doubt in my mind that ERHC will perform well in the future! Just need Mobile to find a little oil. They are no dummies!!



To: Andy who wrote (500)10/11/1998 9:33:00 PM
From: reg  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 671
 
Let's see Andy, ERHC recommended at .93, now at .37. INAT at .20,now at .01. NER at 1.20, now at .92. BII at 1.2, now at .72. See Andy it was Laurel's mistake too, we paid her for analysis. Why would we sell when she painted such a pretty picture? Sharpe was less risky at $3+ than at .60 according to Laurel. That's why I invested my kid's money in it. She failed to discern any of the multitude of management shortcoming's in a number of these companies. NER/SHO/ERHC have consistently missed production target's. NER is now saddled with a large amount of debt and may be cash flow negative. Nary a word about management failures to perform. Laurel has acted as a cheerleader for these companies and a lot of people and their families have lost money We believed and that's why we did not sell. The losses are our's.



To: Andy who wrote (500)10/12/1998 8:18:00 AM
From: Bob Fairchild  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 671
 
I was unable to take a profit in either Sharpe or ERHC. I became aware of the BBS picks last fall. From the moment I purchased they were being touted as good investments. From the moment I invested, the share price continued to drop. I continued to believe the investment advice I was receiving and averaged down. I have little use any more for investment analysts, this is the second time I got screwed. The first time was with Bre-X. I have to date done better with my own picks, and that is the way I plan to ride my portfolio. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me ! Nothing personal but her picks still SUCK ! And before you start calling someone a wimp, I'd like to know how you would have personally handled the loss of over $2,000,000 ? Would you be six feet under or riding your high horse !