Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Technical analysis for shorts & longs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Johnny Canuck who wrote (17983)	10/11/1998 7:59:00 PM
From: Clint E.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 68849

Hello Harry. I liked the ending very much: --------------------------------- He adds: "The only thing you can explain, because it's entirely predictable, is that on the way up, analysts cited every reason under the sun to justify the higher price for Nortel. And now they're citing the damnedest reasons, like the analysts' conference, as excuses for dumping on the stock. They should just come out with it, and say they made mistakes in recommending it at such high prices in the first place." -------------------------------- Re CIEN: Isn't it best to take the loss as a tax advantage, considering it is very unlikely for CIEN to ever go back to 50s o 60s? I know of only one stock that rebounded after a steep selloff and made new highs: CTXS. You probably know about this magazine but in case you don't: teledotcom.com Clint