To: PartyTime who wrote (14694 ) 10/12/1998 12:35:00 AM From: Fredman Read Replies (1) | Respond to
it depends.... i think you have 'Agenda' mixed up with 'Excuse'. I have no Agenda to grind, because the actions (or non-actions) of the 'Company' speak for themselves. I think people have a right to know that a company has set dates that 'financials' would be released, only to have NEVER released them. Then YOU (folks) always seem to have some 'forward looking positive statement' as to some 'excuse' as to why nothing has ever been released, never mind the fact to 'company' has never said why they do or don't do what they purport they are going to do. I continue to say: I have heard revenue estimates of 45 mill, 38 mill, now 23-24 mill, FROM WHERE ?? And the part about 'newbies' knowing they are in for a risk with a penny stock - SURE - I agree they SHOULD know what they are risking - but they might not. And if you say 'tough luck to them', then you are only fueling the fire that is lining somebody elses pockets. I sure don't want people to get screwed like you did, and i almost did. (unless it is some good looking babe) IMO, of course. Mike - i've asked you this before: If you knew 'back then' what you know now, would you have invested in this company, and/or, if you did, would you have continued to hold all the way down to, what is is, a Nickel ?? I DOUBT IT VERY MUCH. No, i don't want to take away your role as a 'proponent' of this stock, but for all your forward looking ideas of objectivity, the stock has only gone one way, and it sure as hell isn't my fault, nor is it yours. defending against 100% naysayers. Stock was, what ? let's say a buck a share once. So today it is what ? i'd say there are 95 naysayers and 5 proponents. I'm trying to figure out who the other 4 proponents are that are NOT 'new' to the stock.......
