SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pezz who wrote (8974)10/11/1998 6:30:00 PM
From: Who, me?  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
pezz, the chain of events on that post shows you how it all came about. Michelle said she didn't know why the lady at Apple got there. I, jokingly, said in another post that Hollywood used to sleep with the leaders to get roles. When Michelle made more comments about the lady from Apple, I suggested that maybe she slept with someone to get the job, meaning the fat lady, since Michelle kept dwelling on the fact that the lady was not deserving. When Michelle suggested I had a 6th or 7th grade education, I suggested she was talking about her own education and then said something to the effect that "maybe women do sleep with the top guys to get jobs in CA", since Hollywood is in CA. I never said Michelle did and I never said the lady from Apple did. If Michelle wanted to take offense to that statement, then so be it! She has read the posts and she knows what was said! I think the material girl that's been dishing it out is having a hard time with someone that won't back down when she bashes people! She's twisting you around to shame me into apologizing for something that wasn't said! I have no problem with what I said. I do have a problem with Michelle telling us that someone who is "unattractive" and "overweight" shouldn't be considered for a job. If Michelle doesn't want to kid around then it's her skin that's too thin!

Here's my reference to Hollywood:

techstocks.com