Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The 56 Point TA; Charts With an Attitude -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Craig DeHaan who wrote (22003)	10/12/1998 12:15:00 AM
From: milesofstyles	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 79273

bring on the tsf hits and lets see if we can use that as an input list going into the next couple of days...it may be a start. although doug is leaning on the 8ma's right now, i don't think he has ruled out the tsf as possibly being valuable just yet and would like to see them as well. milesov

To: Craig DeHaan who wrote (22003)	10/12/1998 12:16:00 AM
From: Doug R	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 79273

Craig, Ok here goes, Keeping the CCI stuff, stochastics stuff (with the OR), 3 dRSI min at 85 (max 97) 2 dRSI min at 65 (the min here appears to be able to filter out gaps that are too large to want to chase) 8 dEMA 8dSMA xover MACD properly crossed and rising without the >0 requirement with an OR in there to catch a crossover in progress....use the same 7% solution as on the 13, 8, 8 stochs. I like this one. We don't have to hit every paste and not every hit has to result in a paste. If we get 10 hits per week and 25% go to the paste, using an exit on failure would allow for a very nice return. I'd say a 2 dSMA crossing below the 3 dSMA is a tight enough failure exit. Doug R