Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Disk Drive Sector Discussion Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gus who wrote (4690)	10/12/1998 5:49:00 AM
From: LK2	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 9256

RE:By Peter Huber forbes.com Which is a better description of the Forbes article by Peter Huber?: 1. bullshit 2. nonsense 3. fantasy I honestly don't know which is the better description. On a practical level, people don't make more money when volatility increases. They actually lose money. The author, Peter Huber, doesn't understand that Asia, Russia, and Latin America economies have lost hundreds of billions of dollars because of this volatility. Even the hedge funds are getting crunched, and they are supposed to be the beneficiaries of volatility. Maybe he's one of those Conan fans, who think >whatever doesn't destroy me will make me stronger< ? Or, the more people that go bankrupt, the better my chance of making a killing? Regards, Larry