Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Football Forum (NFL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SE who wrote (1235)	10/12/1998 10:06:00 AM
From: JakeStraw	Respond to of 45644

IMO, the Falcons are not that good & the Giants are that bad.

To: SE who wrote (1235)	10/12/1998 10:49:00 AM
From: Thomas M.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 45644

The Giants looked horrible to me. In the first half, the Falcons made every effort to hand the game to the Giants, but Kanell & Co. could do nothing. I am very impressed with the D, though, considering that Seyhorn and Sparks are out. Take 2 ace CBs from any other D in the league, and you have a sieve. The Giants D still covers decently, even with some scrub DBs running around the secondary. The Falcons are a lock to make the playoffs, but only because the NFC is so weak. Chris Chandler has not been sharp this year. Don't get me wrong. He's playing well, just not brilliantly like the last 3-4 years with Houston/Atlanta. The Falcons chances against quality opponents revolve entirely around him. He is the straw that stirs the drink. Tom