Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Environmental Remediation Hldg Corp. (ERHC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Andy who wrote (505)	10/12/1998 3:37:00 PM
From: Bob Fairchild	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 671

Funny that you only post on SI regarding BBS picks. Am I to assume that this is the bulk of your portfolio ? If so, I would not consider that diversification. Into the corner for being a bad boy and not following your lessons ! Do not average down and only buy low. Well how about explaining those contradictory terms. For one to buy low, one would have to know where the bottom is. If you know where the bottom is you must be a very wealthy and intelligent individual. However, if you already own shares, you could possibly not purchase any at the bottom as you would be now really be averaging down. Not following the lesson material again ! I heard you predict the price of ERHC was going higher soon back in May and also lambasting those who lammented when the price dipped below $1.00 Past posts dictate that you are only guessing like the rest of us ! No disrespect Andy, I appreciate your ERHC posts but don't try and pidgeon hole your investment strategies on the rest of us based on the mantra of some newsletter writer.

To: Andy who wrote (505)	10/12/1998 6:02:00 PM
From: reg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 671

No Andy, last fall Laurel was touting SHO as less risky at 3.50 than it was at .60. You cannot deny it. A lot of people bought late based on her track record and lost their life savings. Name one company that has gone up and stayed up. Has Laurel any 10 baggers? Why did she not pick a Dell for her suscriber's? And you are wrong as she consistently touted NER/SHO management as conservative in their estimates. Obviously their 50% discounting was not enough. Unocal dumped those properties for a reason. They took NER shares because NER probably did not have the cash and UNocal wanted out.